I thought I'd use "Break On Through (To The Other Side)" by The Doors because it has a high-energy feel that I knew my clips would match perfectly with. Plus, The Doors have great soundtracks for just about any film. Right as the song hits the main chorus, I had the idea of zooming into the footage using an effect to create the illusion of "breaking through to the other side."
Branding
I think it best branded me as an editor through the style of the reel, as it's hard to brand as a writer through a film reel. The cinematography was on show as well. I tried to pick a variety of shots that told a story even if seemingly disconnected. I showcased all the main principles by choosing shots with fluid movement but also still shots that have great colors and acting.
Editing
On the verses, I selected low-energy shots that would flow together such as the setting down of a drink and the picking up of one in the next shot. Then, once the chorus hits, the high-energy shots kick in (such as Thomas running or Wheeler frantically wheeling the wheelchair down the hallway). Done this way, everything has a purpose.
Different/Same
Different: I would perhaps make the title animation more seamless in some way. Other than that, I thoroughly enjoy the reel.
Same: I think the song does wonders for the feel of it all and makes the viewer anticipate what's to come from me in the future.
Completed Reel
All that's left is adding the beautiful music video shots, which will transition very nicely in the reel due to the music video being a period piece and The Doors coming from the 60s.
For Pink Floyd's "Childhood's End", the main message was protesting the war in Vietnam. The slogan of the 60s and early 70s was "make love not war", so this piece seems to be dumping the war. Intercut with recording studio sessions, I think this video serves as a good reminder for what life was like back then and the culture they had.
As far as music videos go, the video itself is not all too technical. It's mainly historical footage from the protests and street rallies, so it can't be judged too harshly. Yet, I think they made the message clear, which is a highlight. The gas masks are a great symbol and the images of people getting hurt at the rallies is haunting.
Elements
As far as applying to my own work, I would take the strong images and clear message and make it a point to include those aspects in my film. I want my audience to understand the message instead of straining to grasp the concept. Something I have already learned is the black and white film and grain. Naturally, this was an element to some of the music videos in the 60s, but it still looks great.
Improvements
Did well: Pink Floyd did an excellent job editing to the beat and intercutting band footage with music video. I always appreciate when artists do that so it gives the audience some insight into how the music was made.
Improve: I would vary the shots a little, but it's hard to critique because it's Pink Floyd.
Thoughts
The build up in the beginning shows that we are in store for something good. Pink Floyd hardly ever disappoints. A strong ending as well!
For this project, we originally planned to shoot "2020", Aidan's feature film concept. However, when the weather didn't look like it would cooperate, we resorted to making "Wheeler", a concept we created around a year ago but never got to making it. It took inspiration from "Misery" and "Front Window." The concept: with two broken legs, Mr. Wheeler can't do much. Bored, he gets out of bed for a midnight snack only to find his house being robbed (he thinks).
Process
Pre-Production: Thomas created the storyboards, while Aidan and I finalized the script. We gathered our three actors: Mr. Rink (Thomas's stepdad), Thomas, and Abby from Get Real last year. We had three filming dates planned (all indoors).
Production: The first filming day, we settled on shooting act 1 in the bedroom when all the exposition is provided. For the second, we got most of act 2 but Abby didn't show due to a miscommunication. So, working our way around it, we filmed with her on day three, which worked out a lot better. Day three went well and was fairly fast (three hours or so). I think the crew worked well together.
Post: This was the most arduous part of the process. I stayed after school and during Power 50 several times to perfect this ten minute short. So much so that I had the entire film memorized (I had seen it too much). It was becoming my life... ha ha.
Role
I co-wrote this film with Aidan as well as did first AC on set and edited the entire thing. Editing, as aforementioned, was the most stressful aspect of Wheeler. Being first AC I enjoyed. I feel like we got mostly clean shots as compared to other peer projects. I also, as always, enjoy the writing part. Creating the idea.
Five Guarantees
Technical Skills: I learned more about Premiere Pro, as always. I also learned from Aidan (camera-wise). The biggest thing with Premiere Pro was messing with the audio and the new LUTs which I have never used before.
Communication: This group always communicates well, except for the fact that Abby didn't show that one time. But, we got it fixed the next day so all is well.
Leadership: I had to take command of the editing ship. This ten minute film was daunting, to say the least. I didn't realize that until I got into the thick of it. I also had to stay calm on set and lead everyone else to Wheeler victory.
Collaboration: We all worked together well. From Juan with the lights, to Thomas with the directing. Aidan and I on camera, Jose on sound. We worked as a collective unit and made a good product.
Project Management: We turned the video on time... so that was good. Of course, we had to jump through a few hurdles to get there. As aforementioned.
Different/Same
Different: I would have lit the act 3 a little different, as well as fix the score on the intense act 2 scene. Some of the sound effects and audio would need to be changed as well.
Same: Most of it. I'm proud of this project and the way it turned out. I'm also glad we got to it after waiting an entire year to do so.
Experiences/Conclusions
Through this project, I got to work with Mr. Rink again, which is always a joy. This was also my second time working with Abby. They're both kind of the De Niro to Scorsese actors for our films. We have a lot of recurring actors, but we try to mix it up every project. I'm glad that we were to create a fun thriller after not having done so before. Finally, I'm glad that I got to work with the same group of creative individuals.
1. We were to create a video using our "camera skills." This could be any type of film, but we decided on a short film. I'm not exactly sure of the length requirement, but we ended around five minutes.
2. It took around two weeks to create this entire thing, since we had two locations and a lot of editing time. I'm not a huge fan of being the only editor, as it means long hours, but that's the way it has to be sometimes.
3. Our biggest challenge was making it seem like one continual set. The flow had to be perfect for the audience to believe that we were going back and forth from behind the camera and in front.
4. I learned a lot of new editing skills, such as new coloring, audio effects, and sound effects. Also, Max composed the music, which was awesome and I was able to learn from him.
5. We were not given a lot of negative feedback, surprisingly. People complimented us on the comedy and acting.
6. I would re-do some scenes, but for the most part, I'm very satisfied with the result.
7. This is definitely my favorite project that I've ever done. And that's a bold statement. Because it was my baby of an idea, and I knew exactly how to execute it correctly, I think that was reflected in the quality.
La Croix - Commercial
1. We were to create a 15, 30, or 1 minute commercial. We stuck with the thirty seconds, because last year's was too long.
2. I feel like this project was dragged on for so long. First, we had the idea of doing Jimmy John's subs. Then, we moved onto La Croix. Scrapped that idea. Went to Caveman Bar. Then ANOTHER Caveman Bar idea. Then BACK to La Croix. All that time in between we lost for making this film. But we still got it done on time.
3. Our biggest challenge was coming up with the concept, honestly. We had TOO many ideas, which can be a good and bad thing. We also had the challenge of cutting down those precious seconds.
4. I learned how to color grade in black and white, and it looks pretty decent in this one.
5. We were given some feedback of cutting down the length of the shots.
6. I would do as suggested, and also perhaps change some of the timing of things.
7. This was an okay project of mine. Maybe we'll do the Jimmy John's idea before eMagine.
1. We were to create a two to three minute short film with a few restrictions: the theme had to be "lost", we had to incorporate a shoe and bungee cord, and the line "let's do this" needed to be in there.
2. This took 24 hours!
3. The challenge of this was to film in the freezing woods until at least 1:30 that night. Filming was the hardest part because it was pitch black out and we had to keep the fire going.
4. I learned how to write, direct, and edit a film in 24 hours! The process was much more enjoyable this time around because we had a solid concept.
5. We were given feedback on the lighting, but that was pretty much it.
6. I would light the scene a little more and perhaps make the film a little snappier, but I really enjoyed this one overall.
7. I'm proud to say that we won the contest and took home some silverware. It took a lot to make this film.
Time Management
1. I'm always using my time in class to my full advantage. I even stay late after school often for three hours to edit our film, which is almost complete. I'm always focused on something entertainment-related, because I truly enjoy this class and want to do something in this field in the future.
2. If I finish early, which almost never happens, I look on my google drive to see what projects we could do for the future. I've got a lot of potential ideas on there, so that's my number one source.
3. Outside of class, I write A LOT. A lot. A lot. And I watch certain TV shows and films to get inspired to write things. For instance, after I saw Pulp Fiction last summer, I wrote an 80 page screenplay by hand then translated it to computer. After I saw This is Spinal Tap this summer, I wrote my 70 page screenplay. I'm a man at work. Lots of things are happening.
Strengths/Improvement
1. I think I excel at editing and writing. I like camera work, but that's not necessarily my strong suit. I know how it'll flow in editing, so perhaps that help when I'm behind the camera. I truly enjoy writing the films.
2. As for improvement, my camera work. That's why I'm 1st AC this year. To learn. To grow in that aspect. I'd also like to learn more about color grading, as that's one aspect of editing that I'm not particularly good at. I'll look to Hannah the Master next semester to boost these skills.
Guest Speakers
1. Morgan Cooper: Morgan seemed to be just another filmmaker among us. He didn't seem like the big star that he is, which is a compliment to his laid-back nature. He provided some excellent stories about the industry and was a great public speaker.
2. Gordon Lamb: He provided some good tips for interviews and a glimpse at some higher-end equipment we could be using in the future.
3. Leah Wellman: She was very helpful on camera and did a good job of incorporating the crowd.
4. Darby Christensen: Very helpful for storytelling and giving us a road map for our feature film. She gave some good organization tips.
5. Ryan Burnett: Helpful editing tips as well as organization. Showed us how to use Google Drive.
Feature Role
For this year, I chose first AC partly so I would partner with Aidan, but partly because that area always needs improving. I've improved other tools in my set, but not always this one. I also wrote at least four scenes for the feature film, including the opening scene, scene 8, and scene 13 & 14, the final two scenes. One can clearly tell when I'm writing versus when Sarah and Mason are. We all have different styles and approaches. I'm not exactly clear on what Sarah wants out of the film, but I think most of the stuff I wrote she enjoyed. Also, I wrote in the customer scene because I've had an experience quite similar to that one, and I knew other people could relate to that sort of comedy. Finally, I stayed up until midnight to write the final two scenes before the table read this next day (because Sarah hadn't finished the outline until that day) and, although I was drained by the end of it, I truly enjoyed writing for the characters and coming up with a solid ending.
Summary
1. Honestly, I think I enjoyed the first project the most. Because it was by far and away the longest video of the class, and was of pretty good quality, I enjoyed viewing it time and time again. A Sitcom Gone Wrong will always be my favorite because it came out of my writing hands and editing hands.
2. One thing I would change would be the approach on set. A lot of the time, we have a good idea of how we are going to execute that shooting day, we just don't have a solid plan in place. For the twenty four hour film fest, we did. I created a shot list just thirty minutes before we hiked out into the wilderness. For our short film, Wheeler, we did not have that detailed of a plan. We had a script, but nothing else. So although we completed everything, there was a lot of down moments on set because we were at a loss for an idea. For second semester that will change.
3. I enjoyed this semester due to the 24 hour film fest win and A Sitcom Gone Wrong. I took away a lot of valuable skills from the presenters.
4. Goal for next semester... as always... to win eMagine with whatever we can. We've got a documentary, two short films, a commercial, and a future PSA. Plus maybe an animation. Will there be a music video? I have a stellar, moving concept for this project should we ever do it.
5. Final thoughts: one semester until I graduate. I want to make it the best semester yet with the quality ramping up even more.
1. I am very proud of this film. And no, not just because I'm starring in it. This was one of the rare occasions where I got to man the camera on a project... I don't think I did the rest of the year! This video was so much fun to make, and the atmosphere was awesome. Just three guys having one last ride before one of them has to move. Emotional. A truly feel-good project. Also, we won a pixel for this so... how could I not choose it?
2. It took around two weeks to shoot and edit the entire thing.
3. Aidan's uncle is very hard to please, so we had to work around multiple schedules to make this possible. That honestly was the toughest part of the project--- scheduling. I remember my agenda being very busy that week as well.
4. I learned more camera techniques and how to be in front of a camera. I prefer myself behind the camera... always. Unless I'm not saying anything, which is the case in this project.
5. We were given feedback on the art direction, such as removing Aidan's watch or my shoes. Other than that, it was mostly complaint-free.
6. We didn't change anything... but... hey! We won a pixel. So I'd say that's pretty darn good.
7. I can honestly show this project over and over to anyone who is willing to watch for three minutes. I can say, "hey, I made that," without feeling ashamed or shy. It's that type of project.
Disconnected
1. This PSA... I still can't believe we made this! It's funny how we shifted from a comedic approach to this award-winner. I chose this as my other project because it is very impactful and has managed to make 90 percent of viewers cry.
2. Took around two weeks with filming and editing.
3. Challenges were mainly in the editing, as that was the longest stage. Also, the pull back shot at the end was very hard to capture.
4. Feedback: Message unclear, maybe more b-roll at beginning... that's about it.
5. We didn't change anything. And we won a pixel for sticking with our gut.
6. This project was something I can be very proud of. We've made people cry with this PSA, feel happy about Stand By Me, scared with the documentary, and now will make people laugh with our new short film. Truly amazing.
Time Management
I used time outside class to better my video skills. For example, I did several videos for Cedar Creek Elementary School, my mom's old school. I did a music video and lip dub. I also created "All or Nothing", a short film to enter into eMagine. I've also been active with editing and have made two episodes of "The Green Screen Show". I've been busy. I watched a lot of editing tutorials, movies for inspiration, etc. to enhance my films.
Strengths
I think I'm a decent editor, so I suppose that's a strength. I can also write well when I choose. If I'm in the zone, that is. I. e., free from outside distractions. I've written several short film screenplays with Aidan that we haven't produced yet. I maximized these strengths by creating "All or Nothing", a short film that Aidan and I wrote and created.
Improvement
Definitely After Effects, editing, things of that nature. I look forward to learning more about After Effects in the summer and will try to implement VFX into future projects. Some other weaknesses could possibly be camera techniques. But that will also be a weakness. Everyone is still learning, no matter how good they think they are. I can ALWAYS improve on my cinematography.
UPM Role/Editor
1. I was in charge of emailing the actors, sending out call sheets, texting them about scheduling conflicts, etc. It was not the easiest job in the world, but also wasn't the hardest. I had to email every time we had cancellations or a new filming date on the call sheet. I got to know the actors through email and text. On set, I actually did clapperboard one of the first days, so that was fun. I was mainly an extra when on set. Around March, I was somehow dragged onto the editing team. Thomas gave me around four scenes to edit, so I had a little fun with that. I enjoy editing, but, as I've stated before, only editing my own things. So I had mixed feelings about taking on these scenes. Nevertheless, Brett and Darby approved, and I'm very glad that they included the entire editing team in the credits. Marvelous.
2. I got emails day and night from actors (and even after the premiere!). I always responded to them. Also, I edited during class a lot to ensure I didn't have to use extra time outside of class to complete the scenes I was assigned.
Summary
1. I loved getting to work with all sorts of different people. Looking back, I never had the same crew for more than one project! That's pretty special. It wasn't like that was planned or anything. It just happened! I also got to meet and become friends with a few actors from the feature film. I liked the freedom we were given to make each and every project different. I also enjoyed having different roles, ranging from editor to cinematographer.
2. Nothing I would change. Don't have regrets. Of course, the future Colin would warn the past Colin not make Absence, our 24 hour film fest video. But, mistakes happen and you learn from them. Even if I can't think of something right now, I'm sure I learned a great deal from participating in that competition, no matter the result.
3. Take-away: Take your role and do everything in your willpower to execute it. As UPM, for instance, I was a little skeptical at first. There's nothing to say I'm still not skeptical. But, it allowed me to learn about a different (much needed) side of the production that I would have never learned if I had not been selected for it. Also, I've learned that art is subjective.
4. Sweep the eMagine categories. The judges will literally be mad at us by the end! We plan to win at least three categories and bring home some hardware. Also, I plan to co-direct and write the feature film for next year. This year's will be VERY hard to top, but I believe we've learned enough to do it. Big goals, that's for sure, but nothing is impossible.
5. Mrs. Smith: I applaud you for getting this far into my blog. I'd just like to let you know that you have been an outstanding instructor for this year's entertainment class. You allowed us to thrive without being too demanding or strict. You allowed us to have creative license in our projects. I honestly don't think anyone else could teach entertainment video like you do. I know what you're looking for in this paragraph is probably criticism/feedback. I'm not a fan of harsh criticism, so here's some hopefully helpful remarks:
-I know you love to detail each project, but maybe spend less time on explaining things. I know the students I talk to like to get started on their video as soon as possible, and class time is valuable.
-You had the right idea when doing a camera tutorial. Some students truly don't know the basic technical things. So, I would suggest next year doing a "Masterclass" day where you invite Brett to explain cinematography and the camera, Emily to talk about art direction, and Piper to talk about script supervising. It would really help out juniors who haven't heard this info before.
-Maybe spend less time on things that won't improve us as video students. I.e. writing things on the board that we will erase two minutes later, or reading an article that we can look up later if interested. I appreciate that you give us all the resources for success, but perhaps let students decide for themselves if they want to seek out that information (post it on google classroom like you always do).
6. Words can't exactly describe this year. I met new people, improved my technical skills, experienced experiences, filmed things, and won some awards in the process.
Yeah, it was a good year...
Next Year
1. 6&7. No doubt. I love having entertainment at the end of the day. A relaxing way to finish out the tough schedule.
2. I know this is just initial thoughts and that we'll do the application process next year. However, here are my thoughts, and perhaps I'll just copy and paste part of this for next year because... my thoughts will remain the same.
I'd like to be co-director with Mr. Aidan Sherrill. I know him best. I know how to bring the best out of him, you could say. I haven't worked on a single project without him and, for that very reason, every project has been (mostly) stellar. We have been developing this adventure film idea ever since the beginning of the school year. We plan to write the screenplay this summer. The key word here is "we". Aidan and I are both equally invested into this project and the writing portion. Just ask him. He'll ask for the co-director position as well. I feel PREPARED for this role after all I learned this year. Darby has taught me a lot, and so has Brett. Aidan and I have both directed films, and we have the same creative vision. We gel well together on set. We also have the same music taste (which is important, as next year's film will be set in the 60s). The point is, from all my experiences this year, I am ready to direct the feature film of 2019-20. I have done just about every single role throughout my projects, so I have a good understanding as to how things work (Aidan, on the other hand, could use a little bit of help with the editing piece. But, not to worry, I have a little background in the area). I have done cinematography for "Stand By Me" and "Zeit", directed "Crime is Crime" and "Disconnected", done sound for "All or Nothing", and edited "All or Nothing" and "The Marilyn Manor". I also wrote the PSA and "All or Nothing". I feel like I'm well-versed in most of the areas of the production.
Naturally, when it comes application time, I will write a novel on the "why?" question if I have to. Anything to attain the co-director position.
When I first heard that we were going to create a documentary in entertainment video, I was a little bit skeptical. However, Aidan described to us a paranormal experience his dad had around ten years ago and it sounded quite interesting. He explained that we could build the "b-roll" around this story. And so became our idea. We didn't outline any parts until AFTER the interview, so the audio could line up with the storytelling.
Process
Pre-production: We mainly waited until the day where we interviewed Robert, Aidan's dad. From there, we outlined certain moments in time during the story that required b-roll and eerie shots. It took a lot of work to perfectly time out the shots.
Production: Although I wasn't able to be there, Aidan, Juan, and Thomas filmed at Brett's grandparent's place (which seems to be the location for a lot of film shoots) for the majority of the scenes. Juan gained permission to film the exterior of an old-looking home in his neighborhood. As far as I heard, production went well and all the shots obviously looked good.
Post-production: This is where I come in. Aidan handed me the clips Friday night before the Monday deadline. I wasn't able to edit until Saturday night. For an easier illustration, here was my editing schedule (and it wasn't because I'm a slow editor either. We painfully manipulated each and every scene to be just right).
Saturday: 5-11p
Sunday: 7-11a, 1-6p with Aidan, 8-11p
Yes, it was a lot. My eyeballs were burned. I had heard Robert's voice a million times. But I'd say it was worth it.
Role
As I just described, I was the editor for this documentary. It wasn't originally planned out that way, but nothing ever happens the way it's supposed to. It proved to be the most amount of work, but I learned a ton. The main thing that really kept me excited was the opening title sequence and the credits. I tried to re-create the sequence from "Se7en" with glitchy letters. I hand-wrote all the titles and credits, and then put them into premiere and colored them to create that creepy style. It turned out amazing! Technically, I learned a ton more about premiere and used my previous skills (i.e. sick dad scene, wavy effect) to enhance the project.
5 Guarantees
Technical Skills: Premiere. 15 hours on premiere does something to a person. I learned how to paste my handwritten letters on the screen and inserted previously known effects into this film.
Communication: It took a lot of communication to make this project come to fruition. I spent a few hours at Aidan's house detailing the shots, and he came over for five hours to help edit.
Leadership: We were all leaders here. I was the leader of the edit, Thomas was the leader of the camera, Juan lighting, and Aidan directing. Without one of those, we could have never made this.
Collaboration: Essentially the same. Our group gelled well together, having previously worked on the PSA together.
Project Management: We worked tirelessly to turn the project in on time!
Different/Same
There is truly not much I would change about this project, other than possibly using a boom mic for Robert's audio. It was very unnoticeable, but, as an editor, I could tell that the audio wasn't as pristine as normal. As for same... everything. I am proud of this project and what we as juniors have accomplished together.
Experiences/Conclusions
I had the experience of working with premiere for 15 hours. So I learned a thing or two. I also will definitely implement the handwritten titles/credits into future projects! All in all, this was an amazing result. I keep telling the rest of my group, "We've made people be happy (Stand by Me), sad (PSA), and scared (The Marilyn Manor). Our next step is funny." And that's what we plan to do. Wheeler, coming out this summer, is an eMagine winner.
We wanted to do a public service announcement surrounding the issue of spending time with family. Aidan and I felt that kids in today's world often place technology and other objects above their own family members. So, this issue was close to our heart and we drafted a short three-page script. We wanted to describe the guilt a kid felt after his grandparents died. He spent too much time with other things and not with family, so he deeply regrets it.
Process
Pre-Production: We went through several ideas, ranging from hunting to family. Something close to heart was a lot better. Aidan and I wrote the script and he created a storyboard. Emily casted Logan as our main actor.
Production: We filmed at Katie's grandparent's house for around four hours on a snowy night. The filming process was rather smooth, with Aidan working as the director and Katie cinematographer. Juan was the gaffer and I could be considered the 1st AD. Thomas was the PA/sound guy. The shots that took the longest were the ones with the grandparents. It was hard to communicate with them the emotions we wanted them to convey. Logan was on point every time with his delivery, and I dare say that we had him re-do the lines three or four times.
Post-Production: Emily edited it all in a span of around two days, but it was at least three or four before we were finally satisfied. Looking back, the final product completely changed after our suggestions and several re-edits. The music was definitely a major factor in pulling the heart strings, and we had to place the highs and lows of the music in certain points to accomplish that.
1st AD/Writer/Technical/Professional
Aidan and I worked on the original concept for several days, wanting to really create a serious PSA. The final three pages of script were completed around two days before filming. On set, I worked as 1st AD to help Aidan with the lighting, placement, and movement of the shots. All the things a first AD would do. I didn't learn much new as far as Premiere, as I wasn't editing, but I worked with a new camera and realized the importance of lighting. As far as professional skills, communication was a large struggle in this project. Aidan wasn't the best in communicating his ideas, so I provided support. Technical skills were used in working with Katie's camera (as opposed to a school 80D). Leadership was used in directing their grandparents to produce certain emotions. Collaboration... well, collaboration all around. Our group really gelled well together and didn't have any conflicts. We also completed the project on time.
Different/Same
We could stand to add more b-roll shots in the beginning, as I sort of felt the intro dragged on a bit. Also, the ending shot could have been more smooth, but the DIY filmmaking we implemented with a cardboard box sufficed at the moment. As for keeping things the same, most of all the video I would keep the same. 99% of my audience that I've brought this project to has either A. cried or B. said it was very powerful. And THAT's powerful.
Experiences/Conclusion
Getting to work with new faces on each and every project has really shaped my style. Every video this year has been different. I realized the importance of lighting (I feel the lighting was very strong as well as cinematography). I also learned about the importance of being well-rounded when it comes to film. No matter the role, you will always have to implement other aspects of other roles into your own. I loved this project, and it has been my favorite thus far. Stand By Me is in second.
1. We were to complete a 30 second to 1 minute commercial advertising a product of our choice.
2. Since this video was short, it took around a week and a half.
3. We faced challenges cutting down the video! It was originally 1:20. We needed to get it close to 1 minute.
4. I learned how to tell a short story in 1 minute or less, which is a valuable skill. I also learned about the importance of music and graphics!
5. We were given feedback on the coloring... as to show the toothbrush better. Other than that, it was pretty well-received!
6. We would change the lighting a little bit. For me personally, I would get to the point quicker.
7. I loved this project as it was a quick one. I met knew people along the way and wasn't stressed.
Music Video
1. We were to create a music video to the song of our choosing. The time limit was a little lenient.
2. This was a tougher project, so it took around 2 weeks.
3. Oh man... we had a lot of setbacks on this one. When we were getting the "golden shot" with the silhouettes, the SD card didn't work and we ended up not being able to shoot that day. We also had scheduling conflicts with sports and work.
4. I learned how to tell a cohesive story through the use of music. I feel that our tune really enhanced the old feel of the video and brought a sort of charm as well. I also learned how to (somewhat) act, as this was one of the first times I was in front of the camera.
5. Almost nobody had a problem with it, except for Aidan's watch and my shoes not matching the time period. Other than that, it was amazingly well-accepted!
6. We would change the watch and shoes. Maybe more close-ups! There becomes a point where you simply can't make anymore changes, but the apparel is definitely one of them.
7. This project has been my favorite to film thus far. Was it because we didn't need to worry about sound? Ha, maybe... But I also just loved the music and style of the video. It was a clean look overall.
Short Film
1. We were to create a short film, meant to be around 5 to 7 minutes. Telling a solid story can, well, be somewhat difficult.
2. Well dang. This took nearly 3 weeks to complete, as our group decided to take on a massive script, running 30 pages.
3. Many many challenges. It doesn't get easier, folks. Actor problems, scheduling problems, editing problems, you name it. We barely had our first act done by the time that the deadline came around.
4. I learned new camera techniques and technical aspects! For example, lenses, lighting, that sort. I also was able to collaborate with the more experienced, so that's always helpful, yeah?
5. We were given feedback on the audio and black spaces. Hey, I agree. Aidan and I specifically mentioned these things to Brett. But, it's his short film. I would want to do the same if it was my baby. So I let that argument rest.
6. We would heighten the audio, as well as cut black spaces. I loved the music, though. Well done.
7. This project was definitely the toughest, but I can't say I didn't learn anything. I mean, it looked good. That's one aspect of film, though, and storytelling is a large factor that we didn't quite have down in this one.
Time Usage
1. I would say that I stay mostly productive. Even if there are dead moments where I have nothing to do, I talk about movies or write down my ideas for a new short film I would like to do. Or, better yet, a feature film.
2. Like I mentioned, I would often collaborate with Aidan, Thomas, and them lot to get a video idea together. I've done this often. Even on the day of... ha. Improvisation! I've been working on a short film idea with Aidan for a while now and have started on a feature film with him.
3. Outside of class, I finished writing my first feature film (113 pages), titled Smuggler's Blues. Watch out box office. I also completed a music video for my mom's school and have created my own show, starring Thomas and Aidan. I've been busy, you could say.
Strength/Improvements
Strength: I'd like to say that I'm a good writer. Only when I want to be, though. When I'm motivated, you could say. I love cranking out screenplay after screenplay. I would also say that I am a decent editor. Again though, there's a catch to this. I have actually found that I only really like editing when it's my own video. I learned this from "Zeit". If you are editing your own project, YOU only really know how it's supposed to go. So you'll make it good, and you'll be motivated. Otherwise, you don't care much and editing is often difficult. Don't get me wrong. I love editing! But only when it's my own film. That's when I go crazy. I also feel that I am good with the camera. On "Stand By Me", 90% of the film was my camera work. I like to be an all-around guy, dabbling in as much areas as possible. I think it helps to better understand each crew member and how you can help direct them later on. Catchin' my drift?
Weaknesses: Writing. We all make a joke about the 24 hour film fest. Since I was under pressure during that time, I wrote a line that was so bad it ended up funny. So in reality, I'm only joking about my writing. Maybe writing under pressure, you could say. Another weakness would be using After Effects and efficient planning. Of course, I've never really had the desire to do anything in After Effects, so I suppose that is out the question. Regarding planning, though, what I mean by that is storyboards and shot lists... jeez. In German, they would say "langweilig". Boring. However, having a storyboard really helped our group in "Stand By Me", so I can't completely knock that. All I'm trying to get across is, I severely dislike storyboards, shot lists, call sheets, and the like. I'm a creative person, or so I like to believe. Not a robot. Not a businessman.
Guest Speakers
1. Gordon Lamb: I learned that it is illegal to shoot on railroads. Also learned that film moves smoother without all the "mundane" shots. And I agree. Every shot should matter. Every one should bring a new piece to the puzzle.
2. Brandon Priest: I learned that you don't have to be older to start a business and be successful. Brandon's business is full of young guys, trying to find their way in life. I also learned how big of a role social media plays in our everyday lives. Especially for advertising.
3. Drew Conners: Best speaker. Even though I hadn't known Drew prior to that day, he felt like one of our own. He had a great presentation, and underlined the importance of characters in a film. I will definitely focus more on characters and their backgrounds before putting my cursor in Celtx.
UPM Role
Like I said, I don't necessarily function like a robot. I'm not a huge fan of mindless work such as storyboards and call sheets. But, everything happens for a reason, and that's alright. What I'd really like to do is have an influence on the actors, script, or shots. Something of the sort. Creativity. Yet, if I'm called upon to create call sheets and be the back-up guy to someone, I'll try my very best to execute that. Even if I don't see it now, I know that having this role will benefit me down the road. The UPM works with the directors and manages the non-existent budget of the film. They also work on call sheets, every kid's dream. I'd like to have an influence on the set of some sort, if possible. I've been thrown behind the covers for the past couple of projects, even if it doesn't seem like it. To be needed is all anyone can ask for.
Summary
1. Favorite part hands-down was creating my show, "The Green Screen Show". It displays who I am, my editing style, and what making a video with friends is all about. I also really enjoyed "Stand By Me" and all of what it had to bring.
2. I would change every single one of my projects if I could; especially "Zeit". They say not to rest until you've done your absolute best work. Next semester, I will change my work habit regarding independent projects. I haven't made enough. I simply haven't. Maybe it's my fault that I haven't had the time, but I need to get on the stick. I plan to make several independent videos next semester, whether it's "The Green Screen Show Episode 2" or another short film.
3. I can now say that I have closer connections with everyone in the classroom. At the start of the year, I was a little offset. Now, though, I have confidence in saying that I can speak to every single one of them without worrying about judgement. I also learned a ton of new camera techniques and aspects, as well as editing stuff.
4. One goal: eMagine. Of course, it's all subjective. But I'm going to work until I don't even know what the word "work" means in order to win this thing. We can do it.
5. It's crazy to think that one semester has passed already. Screw the mentality that, "oh, you have senior year to develop your skills and do all the important stuff." No! The time is now. The time is NOW. I can't just sit on my cushy computer chair right now and expect for things to magically get better, for me to magically make an amazing film. Junior year is just as important as senior year, if not more important. And I plan on making some wild stuff with the time remaining.
"Zeit" is the name of our original concept. The idea consisted of three acquaintances, going on a road trip. Along the way, they have to backtrack and end up getting stuck in a hole: time, or "Zeit". Every time they move forward, time progresses. And the other way around. A complicated concept, nevertheless, but a doable one. Brett wrote the original screenplay, running around 30 pages or so.
Process
Pre-production: Aidan, Emily, and I all worked on the storyboards. Yes, it took that many people to complete. Darby and Brett worked on the shot list, and curated the script. Darby worked to get actors and Brett worked on location scouting. Brett was the director, Emily and Aidan cinematographer, Darby was casting and art direction, and I was the editor. We had a week to shoot. Considering actor conflicts, extra-curriculur stuff, editing time, and the length of the film, we were given another week to create the film.
Production: We shot around 7 or 8 days, 4 or more hours at a time. A lot of shooting! We traveled a lot of places to shoot, whether 50 minutes across Kansas or next door at Brett's house. Everyone tried to incorporate creative lighting and angles into the film. I worked with lighting gels, specifically, to emphasize the certain emotions in the scene. I also did other necessary jobs ranging from placing props to being a "stuntman".
Post-production: Holy cow. At least five days of editing can drive a person insane. I worked endless hours piecing together this insanely long piece. I know the film by heart now... is that a good thing? Goes both ways. I worked with the sound and music as well. Brett was the colorist, naturally.
Role
As I explained, I was the editor and Brett was the colorist. I worked endless hours in Premiere Pro, often dealing with crashes. Fun. The fact that this film was the longest piece I've ever edited says something. I also was the on-set sort of "PA", if you will, and also was the gaffer, working with lighting to set the tone, as well as the DP when Emily and Aidan couldn't be there. I learned more about using lighting gels and also learned more with Premiere Pro. So, yes, the hardware and software department are sound.
Five Guarantees
Technical skills: I learned a lot more about camera, as I was the backup guy when Aidan and Emily couldn't be there. I learned about the types of lenses, aperture, fps, etc. On the editing side of things, I developed a new organizational style in Premiere because the film was so long. It needed it. Bins, black video for shots we didn't have yet, etc.
Communication: Our group worked together really well and had good contact on schedule, shot list, etc. We communicated on set great as well. The film flowed together this way.
Leadership: I was a leader in my own role. Everyone is a leader, I believe. I led the editing department and tried to lift everyone up even if we were stressed about time or shots not working out. I helped as far as doing whatever needed to be done on set to ensure success.
Collaboration: Our group collaborated really well together. Everyone knew their position and what was expected of them. We discussed the shots and the angles at which we would shoot from. Everyone threw in ideas of what would and wouldn't work. We also cut a lot.
Project Management: Even though we did not meet the intended deadline of one week, almost every group did not. So we refocused to meet a new deadline... and in that, I feel that we did. Considering the monstrosity of our short film and the amount of effort it took.
Different/Same
Different: Less black space between shots. It gets annoying after a while, but every director has his own style, so I respect that. Also, I would go back and re-do a few shots, as well as help better the audio. The ending scenes I would've liked to capture more of, as we cut a lot.
Same: The coloring and lighting of the shots are one aspect in which I think our group did well. It really added to the emotion of the scene. I also liked the music and would keep the same. The shots were framed well for the most part.
Experiences/Conclusions
I learned a lot from being in a group full of upperclassmen. They knew their stuff. In practically every area. It was an amazing experience to get to know all the types of people in our group and we had some really crazy events take place during filming. But that's what makes film fun, right? I'll take my newfound skills in camerawork and lighting to enhance my next project.
All in all, this project was definitely the biggest film I've ever worked on. But, I feel like this experience will prepare me for future films and in that regard, I feel complete.
For this project, we were to do another music video, although hopefully better than last year. We chose "Stand By Me" by Ben E. King. The concept was changed several times, but we finally arrived on the idea circled around three friends having a good time on their last day before one of the friends moves away. Our director, Aidan, was inspired by the movie "Stand By Me" for this video.
Process
Pre-production: We ran through several concepts (almost one too many) but finally settled on one after a few days. The storyboard was very detailed and the beat sheet was as well. We created a prop list and actor list in order to prepare for everything.
Production: We filmed throughout several days and on short intervals... it was surprising that we made it! Everybody handled the responsibility of cinematographer, more or less. Anything to get the shot. Our actors were pretty much our whole group, mind Max Cooper.
Post-Production: Our editor, Brett, did a fantastic job in editing the video in as little as two days. He had a short window to work with but handled it well, and the result definitely reflects that.
Learn/Skills
I learned how important time management is and the importance of location scouting. I also learned how to better my camera techniques. We used technical skills in the area of cinematography and editing, communication in arriving on location and getting props, leadership in directing the video and taking charge of the short amount of time, collaboration in working all together to create an amazing film with time constraints, and project management in completing the video on time.
Different/Same
I wasn't there for the entire shoot, so the shots indoors I would re-do. Also, some of the shots go in and out of focus because they were on auto mode so I would re-do those as well. Other than that, I would keep everything else the same. The fades between shots really matched well in this video, but might not for every video. I would maybe edit it a little differently, but not much.
Experiences/Conclusions
I will draw the project management I learned in this film to be used in my next project. The minimal time that we had still turned out to be a great product. It goes to show that you have to make the most of the time you are given in order to be completely satisfied with the end result. All in all, I am very pleased with this project and can't wait to get into shorts and features.
Paul Simon had a simplistic vision for this music video. He obviously didn't have a massive budget for this but still ended up creating a very unique film. Basically, Chevy Chase was acting as Paul Simon, singing the entirety of the song. Randomly, Paul would get up and grab different instruments while Chase continued to belt the tune.
Principles of Design/Analyze
The cinematography was probably the weakest part of this video. But who's to blame? The story flowed and the acting was certainly the strong suit. Lighting was very well done because all things on screen could be seen. The writing and planning was strong as well because the story clearly was natural and comedic in its own way. Direction in this music video was fantastic. The actors knew what they were doing and when to do it.
Story
The story, in a nutshell, was the comedic way that Chevy Chase was singing the song instead of Paul Simon. Simon would also bring out various instruments used throughout the song and implement them that way. It was told through a one shot, or close to one shot, video. Yet, many things were going on at once and having one shot didn't really hamper the video at all.
Elements
I would apply the amazing direction and unique story into my films. Lots of planning went into this beforehand and I need to work on my pre-production skills like in the video. One thing I've learned is the importance of something needing to be going on during a still shot like this. Because so much action was involved, it didn't need to have a ton of shots.
Strengths/Weaknesses
The creator did well on all areas such as lighting, writing, directing, editing, and acting. It was entertaining, in my opinion, and kept the viewer engaged. Cinematography could be improved, though, because the shots were a little long even though Chevy was singing the entire time. Of course, this was back in the era and Paul didn't have a lot to work with.
Conclusions
Overall, this video was well made. Simon and Chase acted well and made this a fun video to watch. It had a simple yet interesting story, and I will apply these techniques to my own future projects.
MLA Format: YouTube, YouTube, 16 June 2011, www.youtube.com/watch?v=uq-gYOrU8bA.
For this project, our group consisted of three juniors and two seniors: Aidan, Kevin, myself, Darby, and Brett. We chose to present Colgate products in our commercial. To tell the truth, I'm not even sure how we came to Colgate. It just happened. As far as the concept for the script, our original idea was to have a guy walking alone at night, suddenly get murdered, and the Colgate ad would appear. The non-sequitur was hilarious when we originally talked about it. Soon, we realized it wasn't such a strong idea. So, that night, I thought and thought and thought and finally fell upon the "Pyscho" shower scene. Good ideas just fall into your head sometimes. The next day, I presented it to the group and it was better received than the original concept. We were to have a guy walk into the bathroom, get into the shower, and get attacked by a guy with a.... toothbrush. Hence the product.
Process
Darby and Brett were in charge of the storyboard, while Aidan, Kevin, and I were working on the script. Aidan was the director, Kevin was the editor, Darby was the production designer, Brett was the DP, and I was the all-around man. Co-director, co-editor... whatever you'd like to call it. We were set to film on the weekend and edit all week. We filmed on a Saturday at Brett's grandparent's house. It took around 3-4 hours to film, but luckily it was all in one setting. Filming was the best part, although it was pretty hot in the bathroom. During editing, we pretty much let Kevin work his magic with us occasionally visiting his office to provide feedback and help. The final product went through several changes and had to be cut by at least 10 seconds. I also suggested that we add jazz music to the beginning to create a peaceful atmosphere before the killing.
I Learned Things (5 Guarantees)
I helped to co-direct the commercial and provide input on the layout of shots and such during production. In post-production, I helped Kevin a lot with problem areas needing to be addressed. I learned communication skills in partnering up with seniors/people I haven't worked with. I also learned more technical skills in making a film that was black and white and helping someone else with editing. I bettered my leadership skills by directing Max, our lead actor, and organizing the final concept. As far as project management, we turned in the commercial on time. So that's a plus. I learned to collaborate with several other like-minded people that I've never met before!
Different/Same
We would make it clear that the toothbrush was the attack weapon. For the people that have seen "Psycho", I think they got that. But, for the non-Hitchcockians, that reference went over their head. So we could clearly display the toothbrush in the hand of the killer. I really liked how it turned out, though, so I wouldn't change much.
Objectives
We emotionally connected to the Hitchcock lovers. But someone was being killed, so not much else. We didn't give a lot of information on the product, but it was a toothbrush so there's not much to tell. Our group called people to action when the actor smelled his breath but decided against brushing his teeth. Brush your teeth people! There wasn't much positive association with a murder, but try your best to find some. You'll definitely trust Colgate now that a killer toothbrush man could come and get you for not brushing. The script was really strong and we relied on it most of the production time, so we used writing effectively. Aidan was a great director and implemented his knowledge of film into the project. For audio, we didn't need much as we used music and audio from the Psycho film. The lighting was well done because it was in a bathroom. Brett did a great job as a cinematographer and I feel that aspect was strong. Kevin was a good listener and editor, so our final project reflected that.
Conclusion
Overall, I really enjoyed this project and the people I got to work with. We worked well together and the result certainly shows that. Now I'm inspired to create more commercials in the future!
1. The goal of this project was to research a designated designer and write about how he/she influenced the design world. I had Paul Rand, designer of the Ford and ABC logos. We also were to design a poster that would be displayed at the Nelson Atkins museum.
2. The entirety of this project took quite a while. It was more or less two months.
3. Some of the challenges I faced were cutting out the image of Paul Rand in Photoshop and cutting out his logos as well. That was the hardest part of the project.
4. I was given feedback on the order of information on the poster, so I changed the hierarchy of the address, phone number, etc.
5. I got better acquainted with Photoshop and learned how to create an appealing poster for people visiting the museum.
6. I changed the fonts around a couple of times until the handwritten style matched the theme.
7. I'm proud of this project, as it looks like an exhibit I would want to go see.
Typography Quotes
1. The goal of this project was to pick four of your favorite quotes and turn them into a design that you would put on your wall.
2. This project took around a month to complete.
3. I faced challenges on deciding what color combinations to use.
4. I learned more about illustrator and how to arrange typography in certain ways. I also learned to put emphasis on certain words in the poster.
5. I was given feedback on the color on certain posters; I needed more variety.
6. So, I changed the Steven Spielberg & Mel Brooks boards to resemble a more lively color scheme.
7. I'm proud of these posters as these are some of my favorite quotes and I feel that the typography matches with the tone.
Logo Rebrand
1. For this project, we were to find a small company whose logo could use some rebranding. I chose C3 Marketing, my aunt's company.
2. This project lasted from the middle of April until the end of this year.
3. I faced challenges regarding which black concept logo to rebrand in color and sometimes faced challenges in finding sufficient mockups.
4. I learned a lot more about mockups in Photoshop and how to design a letterhead, business card, and envelope in case I need to do that in the future.
5. I was given feedback on my color rebrand of the C3 logo, so I made it simple, sticking with two colors.
6. I didn't change much. The one thing I could remember for next time would be to decrease the margin in the letterhead.
7. Because I had a personal tie to the company, I really liked this project and the result that followed. I feel that C3 Marketing has some decisions to make regarding their logo!
Use of Time
1. I feel that I have used my time in graphic design efficiently, as I finish my work on time, turn it in to the right location, etc. When I'm done, I check with Mr. Mason for his opinion and then wrap up things from there.
2. If I finish early, like I said, I check with Mr. Mason and make corrections based on the feedback. After that, I upload it to Behance. I make sure everything looks coordinated and clean on bechance.
3. If there is a project that I cannot simply get done in class, I make sure to work outside of class. This wasn't the case for this semester, but last semester I worked on my vector outside of class.
Strengths & Weaknesses
I feel that my strengths and simplicity and cleanliness with designing a logo. For instance, I implemented these strengths while designing the Paul Rand poster and my C3 color rebrand. As far as areas for improvement, I could continue to get more familiar with Photoshop and the wide variety of tools in Illustrator. To improve this, I could work on other projects outside of class.
Summary
1. The project I loved most about the semester would have to be the C3 Marketing rebrand. Since my aunt is the head of the company, I wanted to design something tangible for her to look at and see what I'm doing in school.
2. I would change my typography posters (certain ones) if I had the chance. Changing the color schemes would be on my agenda.
3. I learned a lot more about graphic design and I feel that this class is valuable to what I will be doing later on. The number one thing I learned: DON'T use computer-generated fonts. Don't. Unless it's for a paper, don't.
4. I would like to set a goal to implement my skills learned this year into my video projects later on. You know, the next movie to shatter the box office. Be ready.
5. Graphic design is certainly useful in all aspects, and I can use that to my advantage to make my video portfolio even better.
Regarding marks, I learned about the six different types: symbols, pictographs, letter marks, logos, combination marks, and trademarks. Symbols have no type used. Pictographs are public symbols used for language barriers. Lettermarks form the company name in type. Logos use words in type to identify a company. Combination marks are a symbol and logo used together. Finally, trademarks are all of the marks mentioned above. Symbols should be easy to read, identifiable, and simple. They should be easy to mass produce as well!
Symbol & Logo
Symbols do not have type used. An example would be the Dell symbol. Logos, on the other hand, use words in type. An example would be the Exxon logo. A logo and symbol put together is called a combination mark. Nike is an example of a combination mark.
Three Facts
1. Easy identification - The symbol should be easy to recognize and recall!
2. One color - The symbol should have just one color, unless it is needed for enhancement. One color is easy for distributing and printing.
3. Heavy weight - Heavy marks are usually simpler. They offer more contrast and stand out more than thinner-weighted marks.
Favorite?
The best fact I learned was to be simple. A logo, such as Nike or Adidas, is easy to recognize because it is only one color and has a heavy weight. It is not abstract. The simplicity of a logo is easier to mass produce and will save a company money, which, in the long run, makes you, the designer, more money. Crazy logos with tons of color do not stand the test of time. I will definitely implement this idea in to making logos for the future.
Conclusion
A symbol or mark is very critical to a company's success. Nike is so successful because their swoosh is so recognizable. Simplicity and cleanliness of a design is definitely something to keep in mind.
For this project, we were to recreate a movie trailer based on a movie that takes place in high school. Our group chose "Ferris Bueller's Day Off". I was the director, Aidan was the cinematographer, and Dee was the art director.
Process
We first created a shot for shot storyboard, which helped a lot. We also wrote a script and created a production schedule. Then, we filmed at school and at Aidan's house. There were several locations and actors that we had to work with. Regarding post production, it took about a week to edit.
What I Learned
Now I know how to create a movie trailer! It's a lot harder than you think. There are so many shots that go in to one trailer. And, it ends up only being one to two minutes! I also am (slowly) getting better at color grading and I learned how to overlay flicker footage on the trailer.
Improvement & Next Time
The audio was hard to work with, as an inconsistency in mics led to poor audio. Other than the audio quality, we didn't have much other feedback. For next time, we will make sure to use ONE (good) microphone to capture audio. Audio is important, people.
Overall
I feel like our group put a lot of work in to this project. It was a lot of fun to capture a variety of different shots, and it was cool to see it all put together in editing. I can't wait to see what we do next!
In the informational videos, I learned about the distinction between serifs and san serifs. Serifs are the letters that have "feet", and san serifs do not. I also found that "kerning" is the adjustment between spaces of letters, and tracking is the overall adjustment. Before the videos, I had heard of those terms but never knew what they meant. Finally, I learned about the five alignment types: flush left, flush right, justified, centered, and random or asymmetrical.
The Big Idea
The most important idea I took away from the videos would probably be the difference between serifs and san serifs. Although I had heard of these terms, I didn't fully understand what each of them where. Also, serifs can fall in to two categories: unbracketed and bracketed. Unbracketed serifs have a ninety degree angle with the feet, whereas bracketed have a curved feet transition.
10 Golden Rules You Should Live by When Combining Fonts
The first rule is choose complimentary fonts, meaning that you should choose a font that is lighthearted and fun if you are designing a birthday card, for example. With that font though, you should also pick a simple font for information so it is easy to read. The second rule is to establish a hierarchy, which means that your title font should be larger on the page than your information. The third rule is to consider context and who your audience is. This could be a standard font, for example, if you are trying to apply for a job. Fourth, you should mix san serifs and serifs, because they are opposite of one another. Fifth, create contrast; whether that be color or font. Sixth, don't create conflict with your fonts. Consider the weight and such when deciding and which fonts work well together. Seventh, avoid fonts that are too similar. Pretty cut and dry. Eighth, use fonts from the same family, just different weights or sizes. Ninth, limit your number of fonts. Don't have sixteen different fonts on a page.... it's just too confusing. And last, practice. You'll get better and pairing fonts with experience.
3 Key Points
The third rule in the article about considering context is very important to typography. It is important to know your audience and design something that is appropriate and appealing to them. Another important rule would be the contrast. You shouldn't have a black font on dark blue background. Instead, you should have a white font to contrast. Finally, use fonts from the same family is important because it is easier to read and different weights and sizes are enough different to make the design look good.
Favorite Thing About Typography? And Conclusion
The most important idea I read would have to be the context information. It is very important to hold your audience's attention. Choosing a font for the correct occasion can, in the future, help out clients and please customers. I feel that, although the videos helped visualize the information, the article painted a clearer picture about typography.
For this project, we were to create a video based off a real music video. We chose "September" by Earth, Wind & Fire. I was the editor, Aidan was the director, Brady was the cinematographer, and Seth was the art director.
Process
We decided to film in the green screen room in order to key out the background layer. Our group ended up using all the help we had and assigned certain people to a role in the video. We also used the tools we had in the room to create the panning shots. After about 2 hours of filming, we called it a wrap.
What I Learned
I learned a ton from this project. First of all, I became more familiar with using the DSLR camera and tripod. And second, I became more comfortable with Adobe Premiere as well. I learned how to use the echo effect, which makes the people in the video look wavy. It turned out to be really cool, and somewhat similar to the original music video.
Improvement & Next Time
The only negative feedback we received were our costumes. Mr. Cooper suggested we go to a thrift store and get disco 70s clothes to match the theme. So, next time, we'll do just that.
Overall
I think our group did a really great job on this project. We varied the shots, which made the video more interesting to watch. We also closely replicated the original video, although not exactly. Overall, I'm proud of what our group created and am looking forward to the next project.
The project was to create a raccoon using the tools in Illustrator. It took about two to three weeks to finish the entire raccoon and its background. Certain tools in Illustrator were often challenging and difficult to work with, being the hardest part of the project. I learned about new tools and how to create certain shapes and I was given feed back on my postcard. I ended up changing the text in the snowman postcard to say, "And a Happy New Year!". I was really pleased with this project; especially the postcard aspect of it.
Chiefs Infographic
The project was to create an infographic on a certain topic, using the tools in Adobe Illustrator. I chose to compare to Chiefs players. It took about two to three weeks to make the whole design as well. I had to update the stats every week, so you could say that might be challenging. The hardest part, in my opinion, was cutting the players out in Adobe Photoshop. I learned more about Photoshop, though, and also got more familiar with the tools in Illustrator and what an impact a non-computer based font has on the overall design. I was given feedback on my arrange of the player's names and positions, so I switched them around, making it look better. I really enjoyed this project and I feel like my design is simple, yet informative and right to the point.
Vector Portrait
And finally, for this project we were to create a vector of ourselves using the pen tool in Adobe Illustrator. It took about three weeks to complete. Some of the challenges I faced were in making the hair (especially) and making the shadows (around my neck). I learned more about the pen tool and also learned that making a vector is not an easy task. I wasn't given much feedback, but I did add a gray background to make the design pop out. I liked this design because it looks clean. The process was a long one, but the final result was what I wanted.
Time Management
I feel like I have used my time in class effectively, as I usually finish the project somewhat early. I used the extra time to create each Behance cover photo and mockup to make my profile look great. I stayed after school at least three days to finish my vector design, so I feel like that built my skills and helped me to finish on the deadline.
Strength
I am definitely better at some tools than I am others in Illustrator. I am also more familiar with Illustrator than Photoshop, so that has definitely helped my designs. I like to be simplistic, so I feel like that is a good strength to have when it comes to design. I maximize these strengths by carefully creating my Behance portfolio to look clean and simple.
Weakness
Some of the areas needing improvement would definitely be the use of Photoshop. I'm not very familiar with it (although we completed tutorials at the beginning of the year). To improve this weakness, I used Photoshop in my infographic project to create pngs of the players.
Summary
The best thing about this semester was easily the infographic. We got to choose our topic, so that made it more enjoyable. I also liked trying to create a design similar to what you see on ESPN or SportsCenter. One thing I would change is the raccoon postcard. I would work to make the tree look more realistic. Also, the original raccoon background could stand some work. I could have created a tree or something to place next to the raccoon. The number one thing I learned this semester would be the use of outside fonts to create your design. I mean, I can TELL if someone using a computer generated font for their design. I made sure to use unique fonts in all of my projects. One goal for next semester would be to get more familiar with Photoshop, integrating the photos I get from it into my design. I enjoyed the projects we did this semester, and can't wait to see what's next.
For this project, we were to create an ONW Now news segment as a sophomore journalism class. We were split into two teams and were assigned roles. I was a part of the production team, which was in charge of the lower thirds, graphics, intro, and outro.
Process
For our intro, I decided on the theme of "The Office", a popular sitcom. We were assigned characters and filmed almost all of the intro in class. The next day, I went outside in cold, cold weather and filmed the opening shots of the school. In editing, I modeled of "The Office"'s intro and made it somewhat similar. I used graphics at the end to show that it was a sophomore edition.
What I Learned
I learned about creating an effective intro and became more familiar with Adobe Premiere regarding graphics. I also worked with others to create each shot, modeling of "The Office" intro. Finally, I had a different experience using handheld for the camera, as that was the style in "The Office".
Improvement and Next Time
I could have used a better font or color corrected some of the shots better. I also could have included shots of everyone (even though I listed them at the end). For next time, I will spend more time color correcting and on fonts/graphics.
Overall
I think we did quite well in creating an effective and fun intro. I think it really captured what video class is all about: learning and having fun. I will continue to build on my Premiere skills throughout the year as well!
For this project, we were to film a feature story outside of our class. My group chose Power 50, a new program at our school. We interviewed two people: Mr. Cooper and Quintin Talbert. They talked about their experiences with Power 50 and how it's going to look in the long run.
Process
During Power 50, I went around and filmed several locations where students were eating. Later on, we used a mic to interview Quintin, who gave us insight about experiencing Power 50 as a student. We also Mr. Cooper to give a teacher point of view. In editing, I made J and L edits, overlaying the b-roll over both interviews. I also added voiceovers between soundbytes. Finally, I did a little color correcting on darker shots.
What I Learned
I learned about framing the shots and got better and interviewing someone. I also got more comfortable with Adobe Premiere and learned how to make out story by using voiceovers. Finally, I used the delayed lead and ending to begin and end the feature story.
Improvement and Next Time
I could have shot more b-roll and closeups, as well as ask more questions while interviewing. For next time, I will remember the delayed leads and parts of a feature story to make the next one even better than the last!
Overall
I feel like we did a pretty good job this time around. Definitely better than the last feature story. I will use the knowledge I acquired this time about feature stories and implement it in my future projects!
